Attributes of Potential Criminal Adversaries of U.S. Nuclear Programs
ResearchPublished 1978
ResearchPublished 1978
Identifies and describes some of the critical attributes of groups or individuals who might carry out criminal actions against U.S. nuclear programs. The major objective is to assemble information that will help designers of security systems develop criteria for protecting nuclear facilities against armed attacks or sabotage. Since there has not been a large number of incidents against nuclear facilities, the authors have selected five categories of criminal, terrorist, and paramilitary actions that might be analogous to future nuclear actions: (1) task force crimes (i.e., major armed robberies and burglaries); (2) terrorist assaults; (3) military commando raids; (4) industrial sabotage; and (5) symbolic bombings. These are examined for common features, including adversaries' aims and objectives; planning skills; physical resources; means of transportation, access, and egress; and amount of time required to carry out a given action. Policy observations are made on the basis of analogs that are relevant to safeguarding nuclear programs and materials.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.