Labor Substitution in the Military Environment
Implications for Enlisted Force Management
ResearchPublished 1979
Implications for Enlisted Force Management
ResearchPublished 1979
Analyzes the potential for cost savings associated with the substitution of first term and career personnel at the occupational level. Its analysis of the measurement and evaluation of labor productivity in the military environment makes it possible to assess the potential for making first term/career substitutions. For this research, actual productivity measures and work unit background data were used to estimate the parameters of a two-tiered constant elasticity of substitution labor aggregation function. The results of the analysis indicate that higher skill occupations overutilize first term labor inputs and lower skill occupations underutilize them. Thus, a redistribution of existing first term and career personnel within the set of occupations analyzed would mean almost a $20 million annual cost savings, with no loss of overall effectiveness. The findings of this research suggest that the attainment of currently stated objected force goals would be associated with a substantial reduction in overall effectiveness.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.