Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 6.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback108 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Focuses on water supply planning in California. Identifies past and current goals and objectives of the water planning programs of California's Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Tracks and compares the planning processes and procedures of these two agencies using as case studies the Bureau's San Felipe Project and the DWR's Peripheral Canal. Finally, the study identifies legal and institutional constraints that can further hamper both agencies' efficient planning procedures. Congress has given the Bureau much more specific goals and objectives than the Legislature has given the DWR. Consequently, the DWR's goals suffer from broad and sometimes divergent interpretations, which have an impact on the DWR's planning process. The Bureau's benefit-cost procedures can lead to accurate assessment of benefits and costs if they choose correct analysis parameters. The DWR does not currently have specific planning guidelines and criteria; they only estimate the costs of new projects.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.