Cover: Mechanisms for the implementation of civil rights guarantees by educational institutions

Mechanisms for the implementation of civil rights guarantees by educational institutions

Published 1980

by Paul T. Hill, Richard A. Rettig, Evelyn M. Davila, Margaret Gwaltney, Karen A. Heald, Patricia Koshel, Mary E. Vogel

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback58 pages $20.00

Studies the operation and effectiveness of four mechanisms that HEW requires educational institutions to administer to ensure nondiscrimination against women and the handicapped. The institutions must file formal assurance of compliance with federal guarantees, conduct self-evaluations, appoint a compliance coordinator, and establish formal grievance procedures. The report concludes that three of the four mechanisms are making positive contributions to local change processes, and that redesign would render the fourth (assurance of compliance) effective. The report recommends ways to enhance those contributions, the common theme being the importance of local actions. The federal government can reinforce local actions by clarifying regulations and alerting the public to the opportunities for local accountability that the mechanisms provide.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.