Fiscal Containment

Who Gains? Who Loses?

Anthony H. Pascal, Mark D. Menchik

ResearchPublished 1979

This report outlines the recent course of events in government spending, taxation, and employment at all three levels, and briefly reviews the fiscal limitation movement and its accomplishment. The report also includes the findings from a case study of the recent fiscal history of Los Angeles, which may help explain taxpayer discontent. Prevailing sentiment, as expressed through the American political system, appears to favor containment, if not contraction, in government. Along the road to this objective, some groups are likely to suffer as others gain. The report concludes with as assessment of the social costs and political effects that containment may engender. It is offered in the hope that, armed with foreknowledge, the nation can avoid causing needless harm through unreflective zeal.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
14 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1979
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 14
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-0176-4
  • Document Number: R-2494/1-FF/RC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Pascal, Anthony H. and Mark D. Menchik, Fiscal Containment: Who Gains? Who Loses? RAND Corporation, R-2494/1-FF/RC, 1979. As of October 9, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2494z1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Pascal, Anthony H. and Mark D. Menchik, Fiscal Containment: Who Gains? Who Loses? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1979. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2494z1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.