This essay proposes a national strategy for nuclear arms. It argues for new ways of thinking about why we possess nuclear arms and how we should plan for their control and use. The arguments are developed within a conceptual framework composed of three national security dimensions: (1) the goals supported by the possession or use of nuclear weapons, (2) the immediate objectives of our postures, and (3) the perceived proximity of conflicts. The formulation of logical strategy domains within this framework reveals some opportunities that have been historically neglected in U.S. nuclear arms policies. In particular, the essay suggests that our arms control efforts should be reoriented toward limiting theater forces and encouraging strategic defenses.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.