Retention of Volunteer Physicians in the U.S. Air Force
ResearchPublished 1985
ResearchPublished 1985
This study examines the implications of the retention behavior of Air Force volunteer physicians on the Air Force's physician procurement policy. It examines the potential of the volunteer program to become a major and, perhaps, the principal source of physicians based on the retention behavior of volunteer physician accessions from FY 1975 to FY 1982. The analysis suggests that about one-half of the FY 1987 authorized Air Force physician stock might be supported by the direct recruiting program for all groups except medical subspecialists. Predicted retention varies by specialty group, training,and grade (age): (1) young board-certified surgeons and obstetricians, both U.S.- and foreign-trained, are least likely to be retained under current conditions and are most responsive to an increase in military pay; (2) foreign-trained hospital-based physicians without board certification have the highest predicted retention rate; (3) foreign-trained subspecialists and surgeons are retained at a lower rate than U.S.-trained physicians in this group; and (4) volunteer retention increases with the physician's military grade.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.