Posttrial Adjustments to Jury Awards

Michael G. Shanley, Mark A. Peterson

ResearchPublished 1987

Motivated by the recent national debate on the growth of jury awards, this report examines how jury awards change after trial. It considers not just tort actions, but all civil suits for money damages. For all types of cases, it (1) compares jury awards to final payments, (2) examines how results vary by award size, and (3) studies whether results differ by case characteristics. The authors find that, in the locales studied, defendants paid out an average proportion of 0.71 of the amount the jury originally awarded. Further, reductions were generally greater among cases with the largest awards. However, some sizable awards were not lowered, and results differed significantly depending on the characteristics of the case. The findings suggest that the system works already in much the same way that the current proposals for legal change are intended to work, namely by affecting "excessive" awards.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
98 pages
List Price
$15.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1987
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 98
  • Paperback Price: $15.00
  • Document Number: R-3511-ICJ

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Shanley, Michael G. and Mark A. Peterson, Posttrial Adjustments to Jury Awards, RAND Corporation, R-3511-ICJ, 1987. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3511.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Shanley, Michael G. and Mark A. Peterson, Posttrial Adjustments to Jury Awards. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3511.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.