Cover: Evaluation of the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative

Evaluation of the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative

Volume 2, Beneficiary Access and Satisfaction

Published 1993

by Elizabeth M. Sloss, Susan D. Hosek


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback88 pages $25.00

Beneficiary access to and satisfaction with medical care under managed care are evaluated in this report. As part of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) Reform Initiative (CRI) demonstration, conducted from 1988 to 1993 in California and Hawaii, two new options were offered: an enrollment option similar to a health maintenance organization (called CHAMPUS Prime), and an option to obtain medical care at a lower cost through networks of civilian physicians and hospitals similar to a preferred provider organization (called CHAMPUS Extra). The authors conducted two mail surveys of CHAMPUS beneficiaries (beneficiaries include dependents of active-duty military personnel, and retired military personnel and their dependents), one shortly before CRI began and another two years later. They then compared data from both surveys in the eleven military hospital catchment areas in California and Hawaii with eleven matched control areas in other states. The authors concluded that beneficiaries who enrolled in CHAMPUS Prime had better access to and higher levels of satisfaction with medical care than beneficiaries in the control sites. Those in the demonstration sites who did not enroll, however, reported levels of access and satisfaction very similar to those in the control sites.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.