Case Studies in Educational Performance Contracting: Norfolk, Virginia
Jan 1, 1971
Conclusions and Implications
|Add to Cart||Paperback66 pages||$25.00||$20.00 20% Web Discount|
First of six reports on eight programs in five cities aimed at raising reading and mathematics skills of low-achieving students. The unique feature of these programs was that business firms were engaged in the instructional process, and their pay was, at least in part, dependent on how much the students learned. This report gives an overview of the programs in terms of their effects on the instructional process, cognitive growth, resource needs, evaluation, program management, returns to contractors, and likely future developments. Conclusions: Performance contracting produced respectable but not spectacular cognitive growth. When aides, materials, and equipment are substituted for highly trained personnel, costs can be less than for typical Title I remedial programs. It was found that effectiveness measures were unsatisfactory, and evaluation was the weakest link. Performance contracting proved useful for curriculum development and enabled new firms to break into the educational markets.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.