Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This volume collects three papers related to cognitive modeling of adversaries. The first, "Synthetic Cognitive Models of Adversaries for Effects-Based Planning," describes a top-down, theory-driven approach, its motivations, and past examples. One of its themes is the importance of having alternative models to force recognition of uncertainty. The second, "Thoughts on Higher-Level Adversary Modeling," extends the discussion and specifically addresses the need, in high-level decision support for effects-based planning, to keep such adversary models extremely simple and to use them to improve assessment of best-estimate, best-case, and worse-case outcomes for alternative courses of action. The third paper, "Judgmental Biases in Decision Support for Strike Operations," is a broad discussion of judgmental biases in decision support and efforts to mitigate those biases. The paper includes discussion of biases that affect a side's mental image or model of the adversary and gives speculative examples relevant to planning of air operations.

Originally published in: "Synthetic Cognitive Models of Adversaries for Effects-Based Planning," Proceedings of SPIE: Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science, v. 4716, 2002; "Thoughts on Higher-Level Adversary Modeling," Proceedings of SPIE: Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science, v. 5091, 2003; "Judgmental Biases in Decision Support for Strike Operations," Proceedings of SPIE: Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science, v. 5091, 2003, pp. 1-48.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.