Cover: Quality Indicators for End-of-Life Care in Vulnerable Elders

Quality Indicators for End-of-Life Care in Vulnerable Elders

Published 2001

by Neil S. Wenger, Kenneth Rosenfeld

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Care for vulnerable elders, many of whom may be near the end of life, has come under increasing scrutiny in the past decade. Studies demonstrate inadequate quality of care with regard to symptom control, matching of care with patient preferences, and optimal resource use at the end of life. In this paper the authors report on 14 indicators developed to identify quality end-of-life care for vulnerable elders. The indicators, which aim to assess the provision of care to achieve a "good death," focus on patient preferences for care and on palliation. Because of the lack of clinical trial evidence relevant to end-of-life care, most of the indicators reported in this paper are based on observational data and Care for vulnerable elders, many of whom may be near the end of life, has come under increasing scrutiny in the past decade. Studies demonstrate inadequate quality of care with regard to symptom control, matching of care with patient preferences, and optimal resource use at the end of life. In this paper the authors report on 14 indicators developed to identify quality end-of-life care for vulnerable elders. The indicators, which aim to assess the provision of care to achieve a "good death," focus on patient preferences for care and on palliation. Because of the lack of clinical trial evidence relevant to end-of-life care, most of the indicators reported in this paper are based on observational data and consensus opinion.

Originally published in: Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 135, no. 8, pt. 2, October 16, 2001, pp. 677-685.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.