Series of large scale disasters, from a refugee crisis to famine or an environmental disaster such as the current tsunami, create the necessity for cooperation between nongovernmental aid organizations and the military. The coordination of these two parties (so inherently dissimilar in their structure and mission) creates a series of unique operational challenges. In the example of Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan, such challenges include the provision of adequate security for those with non combatant status, the neutrality of humanitarian work, and the constant necessity to re-evaluate mutual goals. This novel partnership may strive to overcome such challenges through extensive planning and exercises during non conflict periods, as well as a continued commitment to dialogue between parties. Such preparedness as well as a shared commitment to the greater humanitarian needs will allow this partnership to garner the greatest success.

Originally published in: In Touch, v. 12, no. 2, Winter 2005, pp. 10-11.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.