Managed behavioral healthcare organizations are increasingly using carve-outs to manage American's substance abuse (SA) services, but little information is available about how these changes have affected service utilization and costs when compared to HMOs. The authors compare one employer's claims for SA services delivered under a carve-out arrangement to prior HMO claims information. Under the carve-out arrangement, inpatient and outpatient service utilization decrease, but intermediate service utilization dramatically increases. Costs per unit of service decrease for all services. This pattern of changes is different from that seen for mental health services, suggesting that different factors may be applicable to substance abuse services.
Reprinted with permission from Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, Nov. 1999, pp. 451-456. Copyright © 1999 Sage Publications.
Originally published in: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, Nov. 1999, pp. 451-456.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.