Use of Psychiatrists, Psychologists, and Master's-Level Therapists in Managed Behavioral Health Care Carve-Out Plans
Download Free Electronic Document
|PDF file||0.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
The authors examine outpatient claims data from a managed behavioral health company for 1996 to determine the extent to which patients received services from different types of mental health care providers. Claims data for 1996 were obtained from 75 plans with more than 600,000 members that were managed by one behavioral health care organization. Data were examined by type of provider and diagnosis. A total of 349,686 claims were examined. Doctoral-level psychologists accounted for most claims (33 percent), followed by psychiatrists (31 percent), social workers (20 percent), and other master's-level therapists (14 percent). Ninety-five percent of patients with a psychotic disorder and 86 percent of individuals with bipolar disorder were seen either by a psychiatrist alone or by a psychiatrist in combination with another provider. Among depressed patients, 63 percent were seen by a psychiatrist, alone or in combination with another provider. Only 23 percent of patients with an adjustment disorder and 14 percent of those with a V-code diagnosis were treated by a psychiatrist, alone or in combination with another provider. Because psychiatrists treated sicker patients, their proportion of patients treated (25 percent) was smaller than their proportion of all claims filed. Most patients (79 percent) saw only one type of provider. These results allay concerns that managed care shifts patients away from psychiatrists to doctoral-level psychologists and less-expensive providers. The majority of patients with depressive disorders and almost all patients with psychotic disorders had contact with a psychiatrist.
Reprinted with permission from Psychiatric Services, Vol. 50, No. 4, April 1999, pp. 504-508. Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association.
Originally published in: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 50, No. 4, April 1999, pp. 504-508.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.