Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback23 pages Free

This study estimates the effects of a broad range of alternative no-fault auto insurance plans, compared with the traditional tort system. A simulation model relating accident victims' injuries and losses to their expected auto insurance compensation under a specified no-fault plan is applied to a representative sample of auto accident victims in the tort states. Their estimated compensation under each of several no-fault alternatives is then compared to their actual compensation. The results indicated that no-fault can yield substantial savings over the traditional system, or may increase costs substantially, depending on the no-fault plan's provisions. Regardless of plan provisions, all no-fault plans reduce transaction costs, match compensation more closely with economic loss, reduce the amounts paid in compensation for noneconomic loss to less seriously injured people, and speed up compensation.

Originally published in: Journal of Risk and Insurance, v. 60, no. 2, 1993, pp. 265-287.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.