No-Fault Approaches to Compensating Auto Accident Victims

Stephen J. Carroll, James S. Kakalik

ResearchPublished 1993

This study estimates the effects of a broad range of alternative no-fault auto insurance plans, compared with the traditional tort system. A simulation model relating accident victims' injuries and losses to their expected auto insurance compensation under a specified no-fault plan is applied to a representative sample of auto accident victims in the tort states. Their estimated compensation under each of several no-fault alternatives is then compared to their actual compensation. The results indicated that no-fault can yield substantial savings over the traditional system, or may increase costs substantially, depending on the no-fault plan's provisions. Regardless of plan provisions, all no-fault plans reduce transaction costs, match compensation more closely with economic loss, reduce the amounts paid in compensation for noneconomic loss to less seriously injured people, and speed up compensation.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
23 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1993
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 23
  • List Price: Free
  • Document Number: RP-229

Research conducted by

Originally published in: Journal of Risk and Insurance, v. 60, no. 2, 1993, pp. 265-287.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.