Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages Free

Objective: To develop a method for comparing the quality of prenatal care provided in different health care plans and making the results publicly available.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Six health maintenance organizations.

Patients: Random sample of all deliveries in the six managed care organizations during a 1-year interval. Patients not continuously enrolled in the managed care organization for the year prior to delivery were excluded.

Main Outcome Measure: Adherence to explicit, externally determined prenatal care process criteria that were grouped into three scales.

Results: Adherence to most of the process criteria was 75% to 80% in the six organizations. Significant differences in adherence rates among managed care organizations were found. For example, at the criterion level, rates at which cervical gonorrhea cultures were obtained at the first visit varied from 7% of patients in one plan to 96% of patients in another. The three process scales that group the individual criteria to facilitate comparisons of oveall adherence confirmed significant variations in the quality of prenatal care among the health plans. For example, scores on the 100-point scale measuring use of routine screening tests ranged from 64 to 93. These results were not affected by adjustments for differences in age, race, and parity among pregnant women enrolled in the organizations.

Conclusions: Although in general the quality of prenatal care at the six managed care organizations was quite good, there are significant variations in specific aspects of quality. This information could be useful to purchasers when they consider which plans to offer their employees.

Originally published in: Archives of Family Medicine, v. 3, no. 1, January 1994, pp. 41-49.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.