With the inception of the All Volunteer Force (AVF) in 1973, Army recruiting success has been closely tied to changes in youth labor markets. In making post-high school decisions, American youth compare enlisting in the military with other alternatives, such as continued education and work. Consequently, the future of recruiting in the Army depends, in large part, on the prospects facing American youth. Understanding trends in the size and composition of subsequent cohorts of high school graduates, as well as the labor market alternatives they face, can help the Army to set appropriate manpower policies. This paper examines trends in the youth labor market from a number of demographic and economic perspectives. Since the Army's recruiting efforts in the AVF era have been influenced by the baby boom and bust of the last two decades, the authors devote the first two sections to a discussion of the demographic trends affecting the size and composition of past and future youth cohorts. The authors then proceed to identify the trends in educational attainment which affect the pool of potential military recruits. Finally, the authors present data on the labor market prospects facing new entrants, with particular emphasis on dramatic changes in the U.S. wage structure in the last decade.
Originally published in: Marching Toward the 21st Century: Military Manpower and Recruiting, Mark J. Eitelberg and Stephen L. Mehay, eds., Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1994, pp. 41-65.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.