Cover: The Vermont Portfolio Assessment Program

The Vermont Portfolio Assessment Program

Findings and Implications

Published 1995

by Daniel Koretz, Brian M. Stecher, Stephen P. Klein, Daniel F. McCaffrey

Briefly describes the Vermont experience with portfolio assessment, and summarizes the findings of the RAND evaluation of the program. The Vermont program has been largely unsuccessful so far in meeting its goal of providing high-quality data about student performance. It has, however, shown promising effects on instruction and modest improvement in measurement quality in mathematics. The basic lesson to be drawn from Vermont's experience is the need for modest expectations, patience, and ongoing evaluation in the nation's experimentation with innovative large-scale performance assessments as a tool of educational reform.

Originally published in: Education Measurement : Issues and Practice, v. 13, no. 3, Fall 1994, pp. 5-16.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.