Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life was examined in a sample of 292 patients with epilepsy and their designated proxies. Patients and proxies completed an 89-item Quality of Life Inventory (QOLIE-89), with the items rephrased for the proxy. Results reveal moderate correlations (product-moment r ranging from 0.29 to 0.56 for 17 multi-item scales) between self reports and proxy reports. Agreement was good for measures of function that are directly observable and relatively poor for more subjective measures. Mean scale scores were significantly different between patients and proxies for only five of 17 multi-item scales. Proxy respondents systematically reported better functioning than did patients in three scales assessing cognitive functioning (all p <0.001). By contrast, patients reported more positive health perceptions and less seizure distress than proxies. Patients' educational attainment correlated inversely with degree of disagreement between patient and proxy reports for six of the 17 QOL scales and for the overall score. In addition, proxy educational attainment correlated positively with agreement for four scales. This study indicates that for group level comparisons, proxy respondents can be substituted for adults with epilepsy having low to moderate seizure frequency. However, for individual level assessments proxies should be used with caution.
Originally published in: Quality of Life Research, v. 4, 1995, pp. 159-168.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.