Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels

A comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel

Ian D. Coulter, Alan H. Adams, Paul G. Shekelle

ResearchPublished 1997

The objective of the study was to examine the appropriateness ratings for the use of spinal manipulation for low back pain of a multidisciplinary panel of medical and chiropractic physicians, and those of a panel composed only of chiropractic physicians. The study showed that while both panels were more likely to rate the indications as inappropriate than appropriate, the single disciplinary panel was more likely to rate an indication as appropriate than the multidisciplinary panel. The composition of a panel clearly influences the ratings and those who use a given procedure in practice, in this case manipulation, are more likely to rate it as appropriate than those who do not use the procedure.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
15 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1997
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 15
  • List Price: Free
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RP572
  • Document Number: RP-572

Originally published in: Health Services Research, v. 30, no. 4, October 1995, pp. 577-591.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.