Research Summary
Changing Views of Chiropractic: ... and a National Reappraisal of Nontraditional Health Care
Jan 1, 2001
ResearchPublished 1997
The authors compared the costs of episodes of back pain care between different provider types in a population representataive of the U.S. Data from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment were analyzed. Insurance claims forms were examined for all visits specified by the patient as occurring for back pain. Visits were grouped into episodes using decision rules and clinical judgment. The primary provider was defined as the provider who delivered most of the care. Comparisons of costs between provider types were made. This study finds that there are economically significant differences in the costs of back pain care of persons seeing chiropractors, general practitioners, internists, and orthopedists.
Originally published in: Spine, v. 20, no. 2, 1995, pp. 221-226.
This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.