Enhancing opportunity to learn measures in NCES data

by Dominic J. Brewer, Cathy Stasz


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback28 pages Free

Using the concept of "opportunity to learn" to frame the discussion, this paper reviews past attempts to collect classroom-level data, and discusses whether the mapping of the intricate, multidimensional activities of the classroom can be improved via better survey designs and instruments, or via other forms of data.. Teacher surveys seem an effective and efficient way to gather information; more instructional strategy questions should be asked to assess any shifts from traditional to "reform-oriented" pedagogy. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) should increase its efforts to assess student learning by adding a stronger student component, and should add further items on teachers' background and preparation for teaching to its teacher surveys. As long as public education remains a federal policy issue, NCES has a key role to play.

Originally published in: From Data to Information: New Directions for the National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 96-901, U.S. Dept. of Education, 1996, pp. 3.1-3.28.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.