Interpreting Dutch Cannabis Policy

Reasoning by Analogy in the Legalization Debate

by Robert J. MacCoun, Peter H. Reuter

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages Free

The Dutch depenalization and subsequent de facto legalization of cannabis since 1976 is used here to highlight the strengths and limitations of reasoning by analogy as a guide for projecting the effects of relaxing drug prohibitions. While the Dutch case and other analogies have flaws, they appear to converge in suggesting that reductions in criminal penalties have limited effects on drug use — at least for marijuana — but that commercial access is associated with growth in the drug-using population.

Originally published in: Science, v. 278, 3 October 1997, pp. 47-52.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.