Why can't we make prohibition work better? : some consequences of ignoring the unattractive
Documents the punitive nature of U.S. drug policy and its limited effect on drug use, together with its side-effects of divisiveness and intrusiveness. Claims that in Europe, prohibition policies are less punitive and that drug use there is less of a problem than in America. Concludes that social factors may matter more than policy, but argues that effective policy cannot be formulated without more research on policy consequences.
Originally published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 141, no. 3, September 1997, pp. 262-275.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.