When General Reimer identified the Revolution in Military Logistics (RML) as a necessary precondition of the revolution in military affairs (RMA) , he issued a challenge to the Army logistics community. Yet recent studies of the RMA express little hope for delivering an RML, at least in the near term. This study suggests that RML can be achieved without waiting for the Army to field new major weapons systems. The Army can deliver RML quickly and affordably by focusing on the dramatic and continuous improvement of today's key logistics processes, which in turn help reduce the need for massive logistics resources. This improvement effort, called the Velocity Management (VM) Initiative, has been under way since January 1995, with remarkable success. Chief of Staff Reimer was right about the dependence of the RMA on an RML: dramatic process improvement under the VM initiative is a key enabler of the Revolution in Military Logistics.
Originally published in: Army Logistician, v. 31, no. 1, January-February 1999, pp. 52-57.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.