A Dynamic Model of Drug Initiation

Implications for Treatment and Drug Control

Doris A. Behrens, Jonathan P. Caulkins, Gernot Tragler, Josef Haunschmied, Gustav Feichtinger

ResearchPublished 2000

The authors set up a time-continuous version of the first-order difference equation model of cocaine use introduced by Everingham and Rydell (MR-332-ONDCP/A/DPRC), and extend it by making initiation an endogenous function of prevalence. This function reflects both the epidemic spread of drug use as users "infect" non-users and the hypothesis that drug epidemics die out when a new generation is deterred from initiation by observing ill effects among heavy users. Their analysis suggests that drug prevention can temper drug prevalence and consumption, but that the effectiveness of drug treatment depends critically on the stage in the epidemic in which it is employed. Reducing the numbers of heavy users in the early stages can be counterproductive if it masks the risks of drug use and thereby removes a disincentive to initiation. The strong dependence of an intervention's effectiveness on the state of the dynamic system illustrates the pitfalls of applying a static control policy in a dynamic context.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
20 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2000
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 20
  • List Price: Free
  • Document Number: RP-910

Originally published in: Mathematical Biosciences, v. 159, 1999, pp. 1-20.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.