Are Better Ratings of the Patient-Provider Relationship Associated with Higher Quality Care for Depression?

by Lisa S. Meredith, Maria Orlando Edelen, Nicole Humphrey, Patricia Camp, Cathy D. Sherbourne


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback12 pages Free

Background. The interpersonal patient-provider relationship (PPR) is an essential part of health care quality, particularly for patients with depression, yet little is known neither about how to measure this relationship nor about its association with quality of care. Objectives. To evaluate properties of patient rating measures, understand the relation between 2 types of ratings, and determine the association of ratings with quality depression care. Setting and Participants. 1,104 patients with current depressive symptoms and life time or 12-month disorder identified through screening 27,332 consecutive primary care visitors in 6 managed care organizations participating in Partners in Care (PIC). Design. Cross-sectional analysis of 18-month data (collected in 1998) after the start of PIC depression quality improvement (QI) interventions (in which clinics were randomized to I of 2 Ql interventions or usual care). Measures. Patient ratings of the interpersonal relationship with the primary care provider and satisfaction with health care, and quality of depression care indicators. Analysis. Factor analysis and multitrait scaling to evaluate the psychometric properties of multiitem constructs and analysis of covariance to evaluate associations between patient ratings and quality. Results. Patient ratings had high internal consistency and met criteria for discriminant validity tapping unique aspects of care. Patients receiving quality care, especially for medication use, had significantly higher ratings of the interpersonal relationship (by 22% to 27% of a SD) and were more satisfied (by 26% to 34% of a SD) than patients who did not receive quality care. Conclusions. Ratings of the interpersonal relationship and satisfaction measure distinct aspects of care and are positively associated with quality care for depression.

Originally published in: Medical Care, v. 39, no. 4, 2001, pp. 349-360.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.