Oct 28, 2005
The warfighting potential of U.S. aircraft carrier battle groups has grown significantly since the end of the cold war. U.S. naval aviation performed especially well during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, where carrier-based air power largely substituted for land-based theater air forces because of an absence of suitable forward operating locations close enough to the war zone for the latter. The improvement process will continue with procedures to improve readiness, networked digital information systems, and the introduction of new aircraft and a new nuclear-powered carrier to succeed the Nimitz class. The future promises revolutionary advances in the potential of U.S. carrier air power.
The terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, portended a change of major proportions in the long-familiar pattern of U.S. carrier air operations. Less than a month after the attacks perpetrated by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist organization, the nation found itself at war against al Qaeda's main base structure in Afghanistan and against the ruling Taliban theocracy that had provided it safe haven. The war, code-named Operation Enduring Freedom, in no way resembled the open-ocean showdowns between opposing high technology forces that the Navy had prepared for throughout the preceding three decades. Instead, the attacks required a credible, deep-strike capability in the remotest part of Southwest Asia where the United States had virtually no access. Although Air Force heavy bombers flying from outside the theater delivered the vast preponderance of munitions, U.S. carrier-based air power, in flying 75 percent of all strike missions, substituted almost entirely for land-based theater air forces because of an absence of suitable forward operating locations for the latter (see the figure).
Barely more than a year later, the Navy's carrier force again played a pivotal role when American forces conducted around-the-clock operations against Saddam Hussein's forces in Iraq. Six of 12 carriers and their air wings were surged to contribute to the campaign, with a seventh carrier battle group held in ready reserve in the Western Pacific and an eighth also deployed at sea and available for tasking. The air wings from the committed carriers flew approximately half the total number of fighter sorties generated altogether by U.S. Central Command.
A report prepared by the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute presents highlights from a larger ongoing RAND study of U.S. Navy carrier air operations and capability improvements since the end of the cold war.
The many gains that have been registered in U.S. carrier air power over the past decade—and that were demonstrated during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom—include the following.
Before the September 11 terrorist attacks, the Navy's global presence had been enabled by a highly routinized and predictable sequence of maintenance, training, and unit and ship certification. A new Fleet Response Plan tested and validated during Operation Iraqi Freedom will continue to increase the efficiency of those processes, nearly doubling the number of carriers that can be made available and ready for tasking on short notice in times of urgent national need.
A planned follow-on carrier to the nuclear-powered Nimitz-class aircraft carriers will be a large-deck, nuclear-powered ship called CVN-21. It will feature electrical power-generation capability three times that of the Nimitz design and will also replace steam and hydraulic piping. Four electromagnetic aircraft launch catapults will replace the earlier-generation steam catapults. CVN-21 will have a more efficient flight deck and advanced arresting gear for aircraft recoveries. Most important, it will have an adaptable infrastructure that will allow the incorporation of new capabilities as they develop.
The Navy will continue the process of creating a seamless electronic information network. A new initiative called FORCENet aims to tie together naval, joint, national, and ultimately coalition information grids to achieve an unprecedented level of battlespace awareness and knowledge management at all levels.
Among other changes in the future will be a reduction in the number of aircraft assigned to each carrier, a goal made possible by the increased reliability and versatility of today's aircraft. This restructuring will include:
The nation's carrier strike groups have taken on a substantial qualitative improvement in their overall combat leverage, and the future promises further improvement. The United States remains the only country in the world capable of deploying a carrier-based strike force of any significant size. Today, deep-strike carrier aviation is not only a natural concomitant of the nation's status as the world's sole surviving superpower; it also is the one outstanding feature that distinguishes the U.S. Navy unequivocally from all other naval forces around the world.