Cover: An Empirical Method for the Prediction of Airplane Drag Divergence Mach Number

An Empirical Method for the Prediction of Airplane Drag Divergence Mach Number

Published 1953

by Roger P. Johnson


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback37 pages $15.00

The problem of prediction of airplane drag divergence Mach number was investigated and an empirically determined expression was obtained that is applicable to clean airplane configurations whose wing shapes lie Within the general limits of 0° to 47° sweepback, aspect ratios of 2 to 10, and thickness ratios of 4 per cent to 12 per cent. Subsonic-type airfoil sections are implied, and the fuselages are of the conventional convex shape. Comparison of the predicted values with experimental and aircraft manufacturers' performance estimate values indicates that the accuracy of the method is within ± 2 per cent. Such special problems as the prediction of the effect on drag divergence Mach number of thickened wing root air intake configurations and large interference effects of certain nacelle locations beyond the scope of this paper.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.