Cover: Optimal Decision Rules for the Procurement, Repair, or Disposal of Spare Parts

Optimal Decision Rules for the Procurement, Repair, or Disposal of Spare Parts

Published 1961

by E. S. Phelps

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback58 pages $23.00

An analysis of the procurement-repair-disposal tradeoffs available to a supply manager who needs to meet periodic orders for random numbers of spare parts. The model developed assumes that orders arrive at the beginning of equally spaced time periods, which are long enough for adjustment of stock before the arrival of the next periodic demand. The decision problem is: How many reparables and serviceables should the manager dispose of at the beginning of each period? How many reparables should be repaired? How many serviceables should be procured to prepare optimally for the unknown number of future demands? The policy sought is that which minimizes the expected value of the total costs, including stockout penalties, appropriately discounted over the length of the stockage program. The problem yields to the technique of dynamic programming in that the values of two policy variations are determined simultaneously.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.