Numerical Methods and Program Description for the Inverse Problem of Linearized, Fully-Cavitating, Hydrofoil Theory

R. S. Grote

ResearchPublished 1964

A description of the numerical procedures and computer routine devised to calculate the profile shapes corresponding to two design methods and an off-design treatment for a fully cavitating hydrofoil. The study contains a major program, three large subroutines related to shockless-entry, nose-singularity, and off-design cases, and associated subprograms. A description of the numerical procedures and computer routine devised to calculate the profile shapes corresponding to two design methods and an off-design treatment for a fully cavitating hydrofoil. The study contains a major program, three large subroutines related to shockless-entry, nose-singularity, and off-design cases, and associated subprograms. (See also RM-3566.)

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Grote, R. S., Numerical Methods and Program Description for the Inverse Problem of Linearized, Fully-Cavitating, Hydrofoil Theory. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1964. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3563.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.