The Inverse Problem of the Linearized Theory of Fully-Cavitating Hydrofoils

Blaine Raphael Parkin

ResearchPublished 1964

A presentation of the basic theory and some numerical results on the inverse problem for fully-cavitating hydrofoils. The problem is treated by the two-dimensional linearized theory of steady cavity flows. The problem of optimum hydrodynamic design of cavitating blades or foils, and the conditions required to insure realistic cavity flows are examined. As a result, three methods for profile design are given. Two of these are treated numerically. It is found that, once the pressure distribution has been prescribed, the shape of the profile depends on the design cavitation number. The camber decreases as the cavitation number increases. The numerical methods used in the study are given separate documentation.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1964
  • Pages: 67
  • Document Number: RM-3566-PR

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Parkin, Blaine Raphael, The Inverse Problem of the Linearized Theory of Fully-Cavitating Hydrofoils. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1964. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3566.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.