East African Economic Union

An Evaluation and Some Implications for Policy

Benton F. Massell

ResearchPublished 1963

A study of the East African common market composed of Kenya, Uganda, and Tanganyika. The Memorandum assesses the gains and losses resulting from the operation of this common market, both from the point of view of East Africa as a whole and that of the three participants individually; considers the gains likely to result from continuation of the market, in either its present or an expanded form; evaluates several measures that might improve its performance; and suggests a course of action for the East African governments.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Massell, Benton F., East African Economic Union: An Evaluation and Some Implications for Policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1963. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3880.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, or independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.