Escalation and the Nuclear Option

Bernard Brodie

ResearchPublished 1965

A critical discussion of the prevalent consensus that general war can scarcely occur except through escalation from introducing nuclear weapons into lesser conflicts. The Memorandum proposes a systematic examination of this argument by considering special crisis situations in which hostilities might break out, determining at each critical point the real constraints on each side and the various possible options.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
97 pages
List Price
$30.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1965
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 97
  • Paperback Price: $30.00
  • Document Number: RM-4544-PR

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Brodie, Bernard, Escalation and the Nuclear Option, RAND Corporation, RM-4544-PR, 1965. As of September 20, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4544.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Brodie, Bernard, Escalation and the Nuclear Option. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1965. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4544.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.