Cover: A Model for Targeting Strikes in an LOC Network

A Model for Targeting Strikes in an LOC Network

Published 1969

by Richard D. Wollmer, M. J. Ondrasek


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback54 pages $23.00

A computer model for developing and evaluating a targeting strategy against an opposing force's lines of communication (LOC). This aim is to obtain the greatest reduction in enemy throughput and the greatest time and cost of repair. The network arcs (road, rail, or waterway segments or transshipment points) are characterized by beginning and ending nodes, upper and lower bounds, interdicted and uninterdicted unit flow costs, repair times and costs, and the probabilities that attempted strikes are successful. The model is programmed in daily cycles, with the user specifying number of days and strikes. Strikes are targeted one by one. At the end of each strike, total LOC throughput and costs are printed out; if desired, a detailed status report and/or a profile of total flow vs. user cost are also output. The FORTRAN program is thoroughly self-documented.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.