Cover: The Sino-Soviet Border Dispute

The Sino-Soviet Border Dispute

Background, Development, and the March 1969 Clashes

Published 1970

by Thomas W. Robinson


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 6.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback88 pages $30.00

Analyzes the role of the border conflict in overall Sino-Soviet relations in particular, this study details the two military clashes at Damansky Island in March 1969, examines plausible reasons for their occurrence, and sets them in the context of Soviet and Chinese foreign policy and domestic politics. The March events began a new phase in Sino-Soviet relations in which the Russians pursued a "dual strategy" of threats of violence and offers of compromise to bring the Chinese to the negotiating table. As a result, border talks were reopened in Peking in October 1969. If these negotiations succeed in producing a document that will authoritatively delineate the border, such an agreement might set a limit below which Sino-Soviet relations cannot fall and might even symbolize a partial return to the close cooperation characteristic of the early fifties.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.