Report
Los Angeles County Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Aug 8, 2018
California's Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act provides funds for counties to offer evidence-based programs for high-need juvenile probationers and at-risk youth. This report, based on the annual report to the state legislature, outlines the program's success for six outcome measures (completion of probation, restitution, and community service; arrests; probation violations; and incarcerations) and county-required supplemental outcomes.
Fiscal Year 2013–2014 Report
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.4 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
California's Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act was designed to provide a stable funding source for juvenile programs that have proven effective in curbing crime among at-risk and young offenders. It provides funds to counties to add evidence-based programs and services for juvenile probationers identified with higher needs for special services than those identified for routine probationers, at-risk youth who have not entered the probation system but who live or attend school in areas of high crime or who have other factors that potentially predispose them to criminal activities, and youth in juvenile halls and camps. The California state legislature requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to submit annual reports measuring the program's success for six outcome measures: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service. Each county can also measure supplemental outcomes. For the six state-mandated outcomes, differences between program participants and comparison-group youth are mostly positive, though relatively small. County-developed supplemental outcomes, which measure performance of program participants at program entry and again at a later time, tend to be more favorable.
Chapter One
Background and Methodology
Chapter Two
Current JJCPA Programs and FY 2013–2014 Outcome Measures
Chapter Three
Estimated Juvenile Justice Costs for JJCPA Participants
Chapter Four
Summary and Conclusions
Appendix A
Community Providers of JJCPA Program Services
Appendix B
Comparison Groups and Reference Periods for JJCPA Programs
Appendix C
Probation's Ranking of the Big Six Outcome Measures
Appendix D
Community-Based Organizations That Contracted to Provide Services for JJCPA Programs in FY 2013–2014
Appendix E
Board of State and Community Corrections–Mandated and Supplemental Outcomes for Individual JJCPA Programs, FY 2013–2014
Appendix F
Board of State and Community Corrections–Mandated Outcomes, by Gender
Appendix G
Board of State and Community Corrections–Mandated Outcomes, by Cluster
Appendix H
Probation's Form for Assessing Probationer Strengths and Risks
Appendix I
Probation's Form for Assessing Goal-Setting and Life Planning for At-Risk Youth
The research reported here was conducted in the RAND Safety and Justice Program, a part of RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.