A Psychometric Study of the Modified Bridges for Newborns Screening Tool

Brian D. Stucky, Victoria K. Ngo, Ashley M. Kranz, Chandra Garber, Gabriela Castro, Wenjing Huang, Joyce S. Marks

ResearchPublished Feb 6, 2017

Welcome Baby, a program that First 5 Los Angeles (First 5 LA) sponsors, provides new mothers with supportive services intended to create enriching environments for their children. To identify mothers in need of these services, First 5 LA employs hospital liaisons who administer a maternal risk assessment tool, the Modified Bridges for Newborns screening tool, during postpartum interviews of mothers. First 5 LA uses risk assessment scores from the Modified Bridges to classify mothers as low, moderate, or high risk; high-risk mothers are eligible for additional supportive services that are not available to low- and moderate-risk mothers. This report describes RAND Corporation work evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Modified Bridges.

Key Findings

Liaisons Perform at Acceptable Levels

  • Liaisons provide similar risk scores to one another (interrater reliability) and that their assessments were similar over time (test–retest reliability). Liaison interrater reliabilities are highest for the Demographics/Basic Needs subscale and somewhat lower for the Medical subscale.
  • Experience as a liaison and use of liaison training materials improved performance.

The Modified Bridges Might Overidentify Mothers as Being High Risk

  • The Modified Bridges' ability to distinguish similar levels of risk compared with that ability in other widely used tools would improve if a higher risk threshold were implemented.

The Current Risk Threshold of 50 May Not Be Able to Distinguish Between the Highest Levels of Risk

  • The current reliability of the Modified Bridges indicates, in practical terms, that First 5 LA can have only limited confidence that the given risk score for a mother reflects that mother's true level of risk. The current scoring protocol and item weights used for the Modified Bridges have a moderate level of reliability (0.65), below the widely used reliability threshold of 0.70, while scoring the tool without the current item weights would improve its reliability to a more acceptable level (0.74).

Recommendations

  • Given the relationship between the item weight and items' ability to distinguish between risk levels, we propose increasing the weight of seven items and decreasing the weight of three items.
  • In addition to these changes, we recommend removing two items: infant medical problems, which is redundant with another item on the Modified Bridges that performs better, and mother's use of English, which does not distinguish between maternal risk levels.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Stucky, Brian D., Victoria K. Ngo, Ashley M. Kranz, Chandra Garber, Gabriela Castro, Wenjing Huang, and Joyce S. Marks, A Psychometric Study of the Modified Bridges for Newborns Screening Tool, RAND Corporation, RR-1817-F5LA, 2017. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1817.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Stucky, Brian D., Victoria K. Ngo, Ashley M. Kranz, Chandra Garber, Gabriela Castro, Wenjing Huang, and Joyce S. Marks, A Psychometric Study of the Modified Bridges for Newborns Screening Tool. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1817.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Health.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.