The Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) Healthcare programme
An evaluation of programme activities, outcomes and impacts
ResearchPublished Oct 30, 2017
This study explores the contribution of the Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) Healthcare programme to innovation in the NHS. It was commissioned by the UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme. The findings show that the SBRI Healthcare programme is providing effective support for small companies to develop innovations that address NHS needs, but further action is required to ensure the programme's development and uptake.
An evaluation of programme activities, outcomes and impacts
ResearchPublished Oct 30, 2017
This study explores the contribution of the Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) Healthcare programme to innovation in the NHS (National Health Service). It was commissioned by the UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme. It is related to a wider, two-year study of innovation in the NHS being conducted by RAND Europe and the University of Manchester, but represents a discrete stream of work.
In this report, we introduce the background and context for the SBRI Healthcare study, describe the interview and survey methods used. and discuss the main results and conclusions.
Our survey and interview findings show that the SBRI Healthcare programme is providing effective support for small companies to develop innovations that address NHS needs. The programme has a number of strengths, including low administrative burdens for applicants and awardees, effective processes for identifying and articulating needs, and a beneficial provision of health economics support in Phase 1. Addressing NHS needs, however, entails going beyond innovation development to include uptake and use of the innovations. This step constitutes a fundamental challenge and will require collaboration with other innovation programmes.
Our survey and interview findings show that the SBRI Healthcare programme is providing effective support for small companies to develop innovations that address NHS needs.
The programme has a number of strengths, including low administrative burdens for applicants and awardees, effective processes for identifying and articulating needs, and a beneficial provision of health economics support in Phase 1.
However, addressing NHS needs entails going beyond innovation development to include uptake and use of the innovations. This step constitutes a fundamental challenge and will require collaboration with other innovation programmes.
Part of this could include:
The SBRI Healthcare programme performs a valuable role for the NHS in the early-stage innovation funding landscape. Going forward it will be important to consider how best to coordinate the SBRI Healthcare programme with wider policy developments (including the Accelerated Access Review) and initiatives to progress the adoption, diffusion and scale-up in the NHS of the innovations it supports.
The research described in this report was commissioned by the United Kingdom's Department of Health Policy Research Programme and conducted by RAND Europe and the University of Manchester.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.