South East Wales Transport Model

Demand model implementation

James Fox, Bhanu Patruni

ResearchPublished Sep 13, 2018

This report documents the implementation of the demand models that form part of the South East Wales Transport Model (SEWTM). The model implementation structure and the mode-destination choice model parameters have been transferred from the strategic model developed for the West Midland region, PRISM West Midlands.

The SEWTM travel demand forecasting system comprises three principal components that are either identical or closely related in structure to those used in the PRISM West Midlands model:

  1. The Population Model contains the prototypical sampling procedure and the car ownership models. This component produces detailed projections of the future South East Wales population, which are not influenced by accessibility. The projections are made for all 964 zones in the fully modelled area, i.e. both the area of detailed modelling and the rest of the fully modelled area.
  2. The Travel Demand Models apply the frequency, mode, destination, PT access mode and station choice, and time period choice models. In summary, these components predict the future travel choices of the South East Wales population resident in the fully modelled area projected by the Population Model.
  3. Final Processing converts the predicted trip matrices for fully modelled origin zones for each purpose, mode and time period into the more aggregate segmentations represented in the highway and public transport assignments, and then applies a pivoting procedure to predict changes in demand relative to the base matrices.

Key Takeaways

How well do the implemented models predict the mode shares observed in the local household interview data?

  • Overall the predicted mode shares are close to the observed values. For some purposes the car driver share is under-predicted which is related to how the model predicts the distribution of persons across different car availability segments.

How well do the implemented models predict tour lengths compared to National Travel Survey data for South East Wales?

  • Overall the model validated reasonably well against the tour length information observed in the National Travel Survey, however there was some tendency to over-predict car passenger tour lengths and under-predict train tour lengths.
  • Subsequent to this validation step, adjustments were made to the models so that the predicted proportions of tours by distance band exactly matches the National Travel Survey distributions.

Recommendation

  • We recommend that realism tests are undertaken to verify that the model sensitivities (elasticities) are WebTAG compliant.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2018
  • Pages: 91
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1927.3
  • Document Number: RR-1927/3-WG

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Fox, James and Bhanu Patruni, South East Wales Transport Model: Demand model implementation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1927z3.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.