- What were the methodology and data sources used for analyzing historical MYP and BB contracts?
- What trends were observed across the case studies?
- How does historical programs' use of these contracts compare with the proposed F-35 BB contract?
- What lessons learned from historical programs are applicable to the proposed F-35 BB contract?
This appendix discusses how historical multiyear procurement (MYP) and block buy (BB) contracts have been implemented and how they compare with each other. As context for an analysis of potential savings in an F-35 BB contract, researchers examined 28 historical multiyear contracts, spanning 17 different weapon systems (15 aircraft and two naval vessels). This appendix outlines the methodology and data sources for analyzing historical MYP and BB contracts, provides a high-level overview of trends observed across the case studies, and provides in-depth discussion of the more-recent historical multiyear program case studies.
Methodology and Data Sources
- In total, we reviewed 17 programs, encompassing 26 separate formal MYP contracts and two BB contracting efforts. These include all of the fixed-wing aircraft and most rotary-wing aircraft major defense acquisition programs since the late 1970s that have used formal MYP contracts.
- For purposes of direct comparison among programs, we used formal President's Budget exhibits or justification packages for each program whenever possible. For a rough comparison to actual program outcomes, we used the official data presented in Selected Acquisition Reports, which are formally reported to Congress each year as required by statute.
Observed Trends and Potential Savings
- There are significant differences among the key elements characterizing historical multiyear aircraft programs (e.g., program length, program size, annual production numbers, amount of economic order quantity [EOQ] funding or cost reduction initiative [CRI] funding). Each program must be evaluated in depth and on its own terms with respect to its unique characteristics. Notwithstanding this great diversity, there is a consensus among most program officials and subject matter experts that EOQ and CRIs are important drivers of savings on most MYPs.
- Comprehensive and in-depth analysis of contractor cost structure, particularly on the lower tiers, beyond what has typically been done in the past, can substantially increase estimated program savings, particularly during the contract negotiation phase.
- Development of an appropriate baseline estimate of the likely cost of comparable single-year contracts is difficult but crucial, as it is the basis for determining government estimated multiyear savings.
The research reported here was sponsored by Lt Gen Christopher Bogdan, Program Executive Officer for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office, and was conducted by the Resource Management Program within RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.