Project
IMPACT Europe Explores 'What Works' in Tackling Violent Radicalisation and Extremism
May 25, 2017
Evaluating interventions that prevent or counter violent extremism
A practical guide
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1.3 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
This document provides an overview of data collection methods and evaluation designs suitable for evaluating interventions and programmes designed to prevent and counter violent extremism and radicalisation (PCVE). This collection helps to inform decision-making about the evaluation methods or designs which are most suitable to answer specific information needs, and which are most appropriate given the context in which an evaluation of PCVE work takes place in.
This collection has been developed with the PCVE context in mind and with the aim of tailoring descriptions of methods to specific characteristics of work in this field. While the list of methods included in this collection is not exhaustive, the ones presented were selected based on the breadth of data collection and analysis they cover, as well as on their appropriateness for PCVE programmes and interventions. Where real-life examples of the use of the methods featured in this collection for PCVE evaluations were identified, these have been included to illustrate when and how these methods can be effectively applied.
This document also provides a comprehensive discussion of ethical considerations in PCVE evaluation from a broad perspective, as well as in the application of specific evaluation methods. Offering a wealth of resources, examples and further reading, this document is a valuable guide for those who want to enhance their PCVE evaluation toolbox.
Key Finding
Offering a wealth of resources, examples and further reading, this document is a valuable guide for those who want to enhance their PCVE evaluation toolbox.
Related Products
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Developing this collection and user guide
Chapter Three
Ethical considerations
Chapter Four
Case studies
Chapter Five
Comparisons/benchmarking
Chapter Six
Contribution analysis
Chapter Seven
Cost-benefit analysis
Chapter Eight
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Chapter Nine
Cross-sectional study and data analysis
Chapter Ten
Data mining
Chapter Eleven
Descriptive statistics
Chapter Twelve
Desk-based research and literature review
Chapter Thirteen
Focus groups
Chapter Fourteen
Interviews
Chapter Fifteen
Logic models/theory of change
Chapter Sixteen
Longitudinal studies and data analysis
Chapter Seventeen
Meta-analysis
Chapter Eighteen
Network analysis
Chapter Nineteen
Objectives and options analysis
Chapter Twenty
Observation techniques/ ethnography
Chapter Twenty-One
Policy scientific approach
Chapter Twenty-Two
Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory
Chapter Twenty-Three
Quasi-experimental designs
Chapter Twenty-Four
Randomised control trials
Chapter Twenty-Five
Realist evaluation
Chapter Twenty-Six
Stakeholder analysis
Chapter Twenty-Seven
Surveys
Appendix
Additional resources
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was supported by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration and conducted by RAND Europe.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.