Large employers sponsor health plans that enroll roughly half of the U.S. population, and they are in a strong position to demand increased value from the health care system. But large employers generally lack useful information about the prices they are paying for health care services. This report reveals the prices paid to hospitals in Indiana from 2013 through 2016 by large, self-funded employer-sponsored health plans.

Read Online

Hospital Prices in Indiana

Findings from an Employer-Led Transparency Initiative

by Chapin White

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Questions

  1. What prices are employer-sponsored health plans paying for hospital care in Indiana?
  2. Can claims data from self-funded plans be used to measure and compare hospital prices at a high level of detail (facility by facility and service by service)?
  3. How can price data inform discussions about improving the value of the health care system?

Large employers sponsor health plans that enroll roughly half of the U.S. population, and they are in a strong position to demand increased value from the health care system. But large employers generally lack useful information about the prices they are paying for health care services. This report reveals the prices paid to hospitals in Indiana from 2013 through 2016 by large, self-funded employer-sponsored health plans. Prices reflect the amounts paid per service, including amounts from both the health plan and the patient. To summarize hospital prices and make them easier to interpret, the report focuses on relative prices, using Medicare as a benchmark. The relative price equals the ratio of the price actually paid divided by the price that would have been paid — for the same services provided by the same hospital — using Medicare's price-setting formulas.

Key Findings

Large Hospital Systems Generally Are Paid Higher Prices

  • The relative prices of hospital care vary widely among groups of hospitals and hospital systems, from around two times Medicare at the low end to more than three and a half times Medicare at the high end.
  • The upper end of the price distribution is dominated by the six large hospital systems.

Hospital Prices Vary Widely, Particularly for Outpatient Services

  • Employers participating in this study paid, on average, 358 percent of the Medicare rate for hospital outpatient services.
  • The prices paid for outpatient care vary widely from system to system and from hospital to hospital.
  • There is significant variation in hospital outpatient prices within systems. Within three large systems, the flagship facility is at or near the top of the price range within that system, while other, smaller hospitals within those systems tend to be paid lower outpatient prices.

Relative Prices Have Been Increasing

  • Overall relative prices have been rising over the period of the study, with particularly steep increases for Parkview Health and Community Health Network. Only one system — Community Health Systems/Lutheran — had flat or declining relative prices.

Relative Prices by Type of Service

  • Although relative prices for outpatient services vary widely from hospital to hospital, within a given hospital they are generally similar across different types of services.
  • For inpatient services, overall relative prices tend to be higher for circulatory conditions and lower for childbirth, substance abuse, and mental health conditions.

Recommendations

  • Employers in Indiana should redesign their health plans to bring hospital prices more in line with national norms and to better align prices with the quality and value of the care provided.
  • Large employers can use price data to gradually rein in unreasonably high prices, especially for hospital outpatient services.
  • Over the medium term, employers should advocate for changes in the terms of the contracts between their health plans and hospitals, to shift away from contracts that pay hospitals discounted charges. Employers should also explore options for moving patient volume away from high-priced hospitals and hospital systems.
  • Over the longer term, employers can support efforts to promote competition in health care markets by opposing consolidation among existing providers and promoting entry of new, lower-priced providers.
  • Employers should advocate for, or directly initiate, the creation and maintenance of a multipayer claims database, so that they can monitor trends in price levels and variation.
  • Employers should advocate for statutory limits on total payments for out-of-network care, to limit the bargaining leverage of dominant hospital systems.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Background

  • Chapter Two

    Data and Concepts

  • Chapter Three

    Findings

  • Chapter Four

    Discussion

The work was sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and was conducted by researchers from RAND Health in collaboration with the Employers' Forum of Indiana (EFI).

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.