- What are the effects of nationwide limits on payments to hospitals by private insurers for out-of-network care?
- What are the estimated potential effects that four out-of-network payment limits—25 percent of Medicare payments (a strict limit), 200 percent of Medicare payments (a moderate limit), state average payment by private plans (a moderate limit), and 80 percent of average billed charges (a loose limit)—would have on payments by private plans?
A bipartisan consensus has emerged around the need to address "surprise medical bills," and policymakers have shown a growing interest in using out-of-network payment limits as a tool to control rising health care spending in the United States. Such policies cap the total amount that hospitals and physicians can be paid when they are not in network and prohibit providers from billing patients for an excess balance. Medicare Advantage currently limits payments to out-of-network providers at traditional Medicare payment rates, and the state of Oregon has recently enacted an out-of-network payment limit for its public employee insurance plans. In addition, limits on out-of-network payments to hospitals have been proposed by U.S. senators and 2020 presidential candidates. However, there is a lack of information about the potential impacts of applying such payment limits broadly to hospital services. This lack of information is complicated by the nuanced role that out-of-network limits play in the negotiation process for in-network prices. To fill this gap, RAND researchers estimated the effects that four proposed out-of-network payment limits for hospital care—125 percent of Medicare payments (a strict limit), 200 percent of Medicare payments (a moderate limit), state average payment by private plans (a moderate limit), and 80 percent of average billed charges (a loose limit)—would have on negotiated in-network prices and total payments for hospital care. These four scenarios reflect the variation in base measure (traditional Medicare, market price, and charges) and payment generosity among existing policy proposals.
Strict out-of-network payment limits on hospital care could yield savings similar to more-sweeping proposals, such as Medicare for All, rate setting, and global budgets
- Out-of-network payment limits set below status quo effective out-of-network payments could substantially reduce hospital payment levels for in-network services.
- The strictest out-of-network payment limit considered, 125 percent of Medicare payments, would yield an annual reduction of $108 billion to $124 billion in nationwide hospital spending—comparable to estimated cost savings under Medicare for All.
- A loose limit, such as 80 percent of state average charges, is estimated to increase hospital spending by $13 billion or decrease spending by $7 billion, depending on the assumptions of the estimation approach used.
- Out-of-network payment limits would indirectly influence in-network payments by private plans, but this model is not a form of direct price regulation of contracting private health plans and hospitals. Thus, although out-of-network payment limits would be a bold cost containment reform, they are not as heavy-handed as the rate setting and global budget models.
Although cost containment can benefit patients facing rising health costs, such changes are disruptive to hospital revenues
- The strictest limit considered, 125 percent of Medicare payments, could drastically reduce hospitals' net revenue from private plans such that hospitals might be forced to seek substantial reductions in operating costs to remain profitable.
- In contrast, a loose limit, such as 80 percent of state average charges, could induce increases in hospital payments by private plans.
- A policy that reduces hospital revenues to an extent that results in hospital closures or lower quality of care would not be in the best interest of patients.
- Bold approaches to cost containment—including out-of-network payment limits—must balance cost, access, and quality impacts.
- An out-of-network payment limit must be selected and implemented carefully to yield cost containment without negatively affecting access to hospital services and patient outcomes.
- The level of the payment limit is critical to avoid inflating hospital expenditures or deflating private plan payments to an extent that results in catastrophic losses to hospital revenues and facility closures.
Table of Contents
Data and Estimation Methods
Conclusions and Policy Implications
Detailed Variable Construction Methods
State Summary of Status Quo and Estimated Payment Measures Under Dynamic Leverage Effect Estimation Approach
State Summary of Status Quo and Estimated Payment Measures Under Ceiling Effect Estimation Approach
Sensitivity Analysis of Status Quo Payment by Private Plan Estimate
Funding for this research was provided by the generous contributions of the RAND Health Advisory Board. The research was conducted by RAND Health Care.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.