Evaluating the California Mental Health Services Authority's Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Initiative

Year 1 Findings

Rebecca L. Collins, Jennifer L. Cerully, Eunice C. Wong, Shari Golan, Jennifer Yu, Gabrielle Filip-Crawford

ResearchPublished Feb 11, 2014

When California voters passed Proposition 63 — the Mental Health Services Act — in 2004, the state and counties were mandated to develop an approach to providing prevention and early intervention services and education for Californians. In turn, the California Mental Health Services Authority — a coalition of California counties designed to provide economic and administrative support to mental health service delivery — began a program to reduce adverse outcomes for Californians who experience mental illness through three strategic initiatives by developing statewide capacities and implementing interventions to (1) reduce stigma and discrimination toward those with mental illness, (2) prevent suicide, and (3) improve student mental health.

This document summarizes first-year findings from an ongoing evaluation of the program's stigma and discrimination reduction (SDR) initiative. It describes what the activities partners in the SDR initiative are engaging in; what they have accomplished in terms of developing policies, protocols, procedures, informational and online resources, education and trainings, and media-related strategies to reduce stigma and discrimination; and what the plans for the future evaluation of the SDR initiative are.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Collins, Rebecca L., Jennifer L. Cerully, Eunice C. Wong, Shari Golan, Jennifer Yu, and Gabrielle Filip-Crawford, Evaluating the California Mental Health Services Authority's Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Initiative: Year 1 Findings. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR438z2.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.