An Assessment of Program Sustainability in Three Bureau of Justice Assistance Criminal Justice Domains

Eyal Aharoni, Lila Rabinovich, Joshua Mallett, Andrew R. Morral

ResearchPublished Apr 21, 2014

The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) aims to improve community safety through effective programming throughout the United States. To maximize the impact of its investments, BJA has an interest in supporting programs that will be sustained beyond initial federal funding. This notion of program sustainability is becoming increasingly important as programs have been challenged to operate with increasingly scarce resources. RAND Corporation researchers aimed to better understand the characteristics and environments of programs that are likely to persist beyond federal seed funding and to delineate strategies that will enable BJA to assist programs that it funds in their efforts to sustain themselves. Using archival documentation and survey methods, they assessed 231 BJA grantee programs spanning three BJA funding domains — drug courts, human trafficking, and mental health — to identify characteristics associated with sustainability. They found evidence of program sustainment in most BJA grantees studied, particularly in sustained funding. They also examined the association between organizational and contextual factors and sustained operations and sustained funding. Finally, they recommend a plan for ongoing measurement of sustainability.

Key Findings

Insights from Empirical Literature and from Program Directors Reveal Some Characteristics of Sustainable Programs

  • Following their review of the literature, the researchers hypothesized that sustainment would be most strongly associated with programs showing evidence of increased funding stability, increased modifiability, increased political support, stronger partnerships, greater organizational capacity, program evaluation, greater public impact, and strategic planning.
  • Program sustainment was significantly predicted by measures of program funding stability, program modifiability, and the existence of well-connected project leaders.
  • In post hoc tests, sustainment was also significantly predicted by the existence of well-connected project leaders.

Recommendations

  • BJA should develop a comprehensive, quantitative measurement and data-collection plan, permitting the systematic tracking and analysis of performance and outcome measures of program sustainment. The measurement plan should include longitudinal assessment of grantee performance beyond the award period.
  • BJA should develop a procedure for educating grantees early about strategies for program sustainment that are grounded in existing literature.
  • Although it is not yet known whether a single standardized evaluation process for all BJA grantees would be feasible or valuable for fostering program sustainment, the authors recommend support for further research to investigate this possibility.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2014
  • Pages: 62
  • Document Number: RR-550-BJA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Aharoni, Eyal, Lila Rabinovich, Joshua Mallett, and Andrew R. Morral, An Assessment of Program Sustainability in Three Bureau of Justice Assistance Criminal Justice Domains, RAND Corporation, RR-550-BJA, 2014. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR550.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Aharoni, Eyal, Lila Rabinovich, Joshua Mallett, and Andrew R. Morral, An Assessment of Program Sustainability in Three Bureau of Justice Assistance Criminal Justice Domains. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR550.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and was conducted in the Safety and Justice Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.