An Assessment of Program Sustainability in Three Bureau of Justice Assistance Criminal Justice Domains

by Eyal Aharoni, Lila Rabinovich, Joshua Mallett, Andrew R. Morral

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Question

  1. What program characteristics were found to predict sustainment of operations or funding?

The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) aims to improve community safety through effective programming throughout the United States. To maximize the impact of its investments, BJA has an interest in supporting programs that will be sustained beyond initial federal funding. This notion of program sustainability is becoming increasingly important as programs have been challenged to operate with increasingly scarce resources. RAND Corporation researchers aimed to better understand the characteristics and environments of programs that are likely to persist beyond federal seed funding and to delineate strategies that will enable BJA to assist programs that it funds in their efforts to sustain themselves. Using archival documentation and survey methods, they assessed 231 BJA grantee programs spanning three BJA funding domains — drug courts, human trafficking, and mental health — to identify characteristics associated with sustainability. They found evidence of program sustainment in most BJA grantees studied, particularly in sustained funding. They also examined the association between organizational and contextual factors and sustained operations and sustained funding. Finally, they recommend a plan for ongoing measurement of sustainability.

Key Findings

Insights from Empirical Literature and from Program Directors Reveal Some Characteristics of Sustainable Programs

  • Following their review of the literature, the researchers hypothesized that sustainment would be most strongly associated with programs showing evidence of increased funding stability, increased modifiability, increased political support, stronger partnerships, greater organizational capacity, program evaluation, greater public impact, and strategic planning.
  • Program sustainment was significantly predicted by measures of program funding stability, program modifiability, and the existence of well-connected project leaders.
  • In post hoc tests, sustainment was also significantly predicted by the existence of well-connected project leaders.

Recommendations

  • BJA should develop a comprehensive, quantitative measurement and data-collection plan, permitting the systematic tracking and analysis of performance and outcome measures of program sustainment. The measurement plan should include longitudinal assessment of grantee performance beyond the award period.
  • BJA should develop a procedure for educating grantees early about strategies for program sustainment that are grounded in existing literature.
  • Although it is not yet known whether a single standardized evaluation process for all BJA grantees would be feasible or valuable for fostering program sustainment, the authors recommend support for further research to investigate this possibility.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Insights on Program Sustainability from the Empirical Literature

  • Chapter Three

    Insights on Program Sustainability from Successful Program Directors

  • Chapter Four

    Factors Affecting the Sustainment of Bureau of Justice Assistance — Supported Programs

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Variables Collected from Bureau of Justice Assistance Reports

  • Appendix B

    Survey Questions

  • Appendix C

    Results of A Priori Logistic Regressions

  • Appendix D

    Results of Post Hoc Logistic Regressions

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and was conducted in the Safety and Justice Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.