Enhancing Performance Under Stress
Stress Inoculation Training for Battlefield Airmen
ResearchPublished Jul 23, 2014
USAF pararescue and combat controllers routinely recover downed or injured military personnel and direct military aircraft in hostile or denied regions. Consequently, to be effective in these careers requires the ability to cope with severe stress. The USAF uses many strategies to ensure that battlefield airmen perform well under stress but one strategy, termed stress inoculation training, has not been fully incorporated as a training element.
Stress Inoculation Training for Battlefield Airmen
ResearchPublished Jul 23, 2014
USAF pararescue and combat controllers routinely recover downed or injured military personnel and direct military aircraft in hostile or denied regions. Consequently, to be effective in these careers requires the ability to cope with severe stress. The USAF uses many strategies to ensure that battlefield airmen perform well under stress but one strategy, termed stress inoculation training (SIT), has not been fully incorporated as a training element. Current Air Force strategies include screening out individuals unable to tolerate stress during initial selection and in training, exposing candidates to a variety of stressors during training, and providing airmen with education and support, both predeployment and postdeployment. Although some of these strategies are consistent with SIT principles, additional training should focus on the cognitive and behavioral skills (e.g., goal-setting, energy/arousal control) to help airmen perform effectively under stress. The authors conducted an extensive literature review to better understand modern stress theories, and they interviewed Air Force instructors from the Air Education and Training Command and formed small focus groups with combat controllers and pararescuemen. The goal of the focus groups was to identify what preparation, if any, battlefield airmen had to optimize their performance under stress. The authors also reviewed key official training documents, training plans, and instruction plans.
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.