Report
Evaluation of CMS' FQHC APCP Demonstration: Final First Annual Report
Apr 8, 2015
Evaluation of CMS's Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice (APCP) Demonstration
Final Second Annual Report
Download eBook for Free
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 2.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Questions
- What are the effects of interventions designed to stimulate advanced primary care principles on changes in practice structure and on recognition status from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)?
- Do demonstration sites deliver better beneficiary processes and outcomes than comparison sites?
- Which practice-site and beneficiary characteristics are associated with observed changes in structures, processes, and outcomes?
In December 2009, President Barack Obama directed the Department of Health and Human Services, acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), to implement a three-year demonstration intended to support the transformation of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) into advanced primary care practices (APCPs) in support of Medicare beneficiaries. RAND is conducting an independent evaluation of the FQHC APCP demonstration for CMS. The evaluation includes studying the processes and challenges involved in transforming FQHCs into APCPs and assessing the effects of the APCP model on access, quality, and cost of care provided to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries currently served by FQHCs. This is the second of three annual reports on this project.
Key Findings
Interim Findings Show More Sites Achieving NCQA Recognition
- Though sites had a slow start in achieving NCQA Level 3 recognition, significantly more demonstration than comparison FQHCs (69 percent versus 11 percent) achieved NCQA Level 3 recognition by October 2014.
- Preliminary analyses show significant differences between demonstration and comparison FQHCs for most measured claims-based metrics, but no differences for most beneficiary survey--based metrics.
Related Products
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Key Policy Question 1: What Are the Effects of Interventions Designed to Stimulate APC Principles on Changes in Practice Structure and on NCQA Recognition Status?
Chapter Three
Key Policy Question 2: Do Demonstration Sites Deliver Better Beneficiary Processes and Outcomes Than Comparison Sites?
Chapter Four
Key Policy Question 3: Which Practice-Site Characteristics Are Associated with Observed Changes in Structures, Including NCQA Recognition Status, and with Patient-Level Processes and Outcomes?
Chapter Five
Conclusion
Appendix A
Data Sources
Appendix B
Medicare Claims Methods
Appendix C
Baseline Beneficiary Survey
Appendix D
RAS/NCQA Data
Appendix E
CASE Methods
Appendix F
Qualitative Methods
Appendix G
Site Leader Report of How Site Payments Are Used
Appendix H
NCQA Webinar Participation by Cluster
Appendix I
Predictors of NCQA Webinar Participation
Appendix J
PCA Delivery of TA
The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.