Love Letters Tied to Bricks
Pitfalls of Presentations as Professional Communication
ResearchPublished Sep 24, 2024
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) briefings often are visually and textually brick-like in their information density and challenging for audiences to interpret. In this report, the author summarizes empirical research on how visual information is interpreted and offers recommendations to improve the effectiveness of visual rhetoric and slide design for briefings of complex analysis in DoD and other professional settings.
Pitfalls of Presentations as Professional Communication
ResearchPublished Sep 24, 2024
Research on effective communication is advancing and the tools to analyze and present sophisticated analysis are rapidly improving, but these improved techniques are often not used in U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) briefings. DoD policies, including limits on the number of slides presented and the desire for slides to stand alone without the presenter's remarks, exacerbate this problem. As a result, DoD briefings are visually and textually brick-like in their information density and can be challenging for audiences to interpret.
Extensive cognitive psychology research provides strong evidence that briefings can overwhelm the limited attention capacity of an audience. Presenters should seek to focus the audience's attention and achieve greater comprehension. In this report, the author discusses findings from a literature review and informal interviews with officials in the DoD analytic community on data visualization tools, in-house data visualization expertise, briefing production workflow, and current constraints on the briefing form. The author highlights some of the relevant empiric research and offers specific strategies for improving the design of graphic elements, slides, and presentations used in DoD briefings and audiences' understanding and retention of presented information.
This research was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) and the Analysis Working Group and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Program of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.